| 017 ## - Autre numéro d'identification normalisé |
| Numéro normalisé |
10.1515/zfrs-2019-0011 |
| 100 ## - Données générales de traitement |
| données générales de traitement |
20190729k u||y0frey50 ba |
| 101 ## - Langue |
| langue du document |
allemand |
| 200 ## - Titre |
| titre propre |
Legal, illegal ... – wer genau? |
| type de document |
Brochure |
| titre parallèle |
Who is (il)legal now? The Swiss refugee solidarity movement and the quarrel about the law 1973 – 1992 |
| complément du titre |
Die Schweizer Asylbewegung und der Streit um das Recht 1973–1992 |
| Auteur |
Jonathan Pärli |
| 210 ## - Editeur |
| lieu de publication |
Berlin |
| nom de l'éditeur |
De Gruyter Oldenbourg |
| date de publication |
2019 |
| 215 ## - Description |
| Importance matérielle |
27 (p. 177-203) |
| format |
23 cm |
| 225 ## - collection |
| titre de la collection |
Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie, 39 |
| complément du titre |
The German Journal of Law and Society |
| numérotation du volume |
2 |
| ISSN de la collection |
0174-0202 |
| 230 ## - Zone particulière à certains types de documents : ressources électroniques |
| définition et volume des fichiers |
1 fichier PDF (texte) |
| 300 ## - Note |
| note |
« The central demand by the Swiss refugee solidarity movement was that the State abide by the law in its asylum practice. This article discusses the affirmative critique of the law formulated by activists in the 1980 s. It does so by drawing on Jacques Rancière’s work on the relationship between politics and aisthesis:<br/>in his account politics is not primarily about constitutions and laws, but about how the sensible texture of the community is configured, on which the meaning<br/>of those laws and constitutions depends. Politically the movement subjectivized itself as the “other Switzerland”; under this name it disturbed the reigning “dis-<br/>tribution of the sensible” by making the arcane asylum practice visible and open to critique in the first place. At the same time, the acts of civil disobedience the<br/>movement employed complicated the question of who acts (il)legally and created a polemical stage for the law. It was in such paradoxical situations of communication, which Rancière calls “disagreements”, that the movement found an audience for its critique – a critique which previously had gone unheard within the established institutional framework. The most important effect of this disagreement brought about by the refugee solidarity movement was the introduction of judicial review in Swiss asylum law in the early 1990 s. » [Abstract] |
| 601 ## - sujets |
| koha internal code |
1789 |
| sujet |
SOS Asile |
| subdivision géographique |
Vaud |
| 601 ## - sujets |
| koha internal code |
3128 |
| sujet |
Solidarité sans frontières |
| élément rejeté |
CAS/MODS |
| 606 ## - sujets |
| koha internal code |
1123 |
| sujet |
Droit d'asile |
| 606 ## - sujets |
| koha internal code |
1063 |
| sujet |
Migration |
| 607 ## - sujets |
| koha internal code |
414 |
| sujet |
Suisse |
| 700 ## - Auteur |
| koha internal code |
7282 |
| auteur |
Pärli |
| partie du nom autre que l'élément d'entrée |
Jonathan |
| 801 ## - source de catalogage |
| pays |
CH |
| agence de catalogage |
CH-002049-8 |
| 856 ## - accès |
| URI |
https://doi.org/10.1515/zfrs-2019-0011 |